“Our mission is to provide the highest quality scientific information and analysis to enable a healthy food system and a healthy world”

The Bioscience Resource Project provides scientific and intellectual resources for a healthy future. It publishes Independent Science News, a media service devoted to food and agriculture, and their impacts on health and the environment. It also offers resources for scientists and educators and internships and training for students. Through its innovative scientific journalism and original biosafety review articles, the project provides unique and revealing perspectives on issues that are fundamental to the survival of people and the planet. The project does not accept advertising or corporate funding and is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization. It is completely dependent on individual donations.We invite you to join the Project as a contributor or a donor.

Bioscience Resource Project News and Views

“Poison Papers” Documents Now at UCSF Industry Documents Library

Thousands of previously internal industry documents called the “Poison Papers” are now freely available for public review and research in University of California, San Francisco’s Industry Documents Library (IDL).

The “Poison Papers” include approximately 5,000 digitized copies of materials gathered primarily by Carol Van Strum, who reportedly collected over 100,000 documents from her battles with Dow, Monsanto, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Forestry Service, and others over PCBs, dioxin, and the aerial spraying of herbicide 2,4,5-T in the forest where she lived. The chemical dioxin, a serious pollutant of chemical and pulp and paper manufacturing, was a contaminant in Agent Orange, which the U.S. military sprayed in Vietnam and was linked to serious health problems, including birth defects.

“I collected these papers over decades and am so thrilled that they will be freely accessible to activists, lawyers, community groups, and anyone who is working to challenge the chemical industry’s poisoning of people and our homes,” said Van Strum who gathered and stored the papers over a 40-year period. Additional documents were gathered by journalists Peter von Stackelberg and Eric Coppolino, and environmentalist Diane Hebert, who helped to preserve the documents and make them available to the public.

What did companies know and when did they know it?

PRHE helped to secure the collection for inclusion in the IDL to provide free public access to anyone who is interested in investigating chemical industry behavior or corporate cover ups.

“One of the best ways to hold industry accountable is transparency and I urge policymakers to review these papers to inform systemic changes so that we stop poisoning people first and asking questions later,” said Tracey J. Woodruff, PhD, MPH, professor and director of PRHE, the new Center to End Corporate Harm at UCSF, and co-author of “The Devil They Knew,” an analysis of internal industry documents donated by attorney Rob Billot from his litigation against 3M and Dupont, which hid the health harms of PFAS chemicals for decades.

Growing Industry Documents Collections

The “Poison Papers” documents add to the UCSF Industry Documents Library, established in 2002 with the groundbreaking Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library, which has fostered scientific and public health discoveries shaping tobacco policy in the U.S. and around the world. The Tobacco collection was followed by archives of documents from other industries including chemical, opioid and other drugs, fossil fuels, and food. All collections have document-level indexing and are cross-searchable, enabling researchers to identify common patterns and links between industries and to study their effects on public health.

“Public archives promote transparency and accountability,” said Kate Tasker, MLIS, Director of the UCSF Industry Documents Library. “Adding the ‘Poison Papers’ to our Library preserves these materials in a centralized and fully searchable database to make this information freely and openly available to the public.”

The Bioscience Resource Project, along with the Center for Media and Democracy, the Park Foundation, and the late Rosalind Peterson provided funding to digitize the documents and contributed the digitized copies to the IDL for long-term preservation and public access.

“The Poison Papers are an incredible document collection. They contain unique and compelling proof of high-level malfeasance and coordinated deception by chemical industry multinationals,” said Bioscience Resource Project Executive Director Jonathan Latham, PhD. “But more, some of its most troubling documents show deep complicity on the part of government regulators, including the EPA and other government agencies. In this they make a spectacular but also unsettling trove.”

Text of this post comes from the website of PRHE  (Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment).

Share

Global Civil Society: The Dire Consequences of Secretive Biotech Regulation

Featured today (Tuesday, 25th Feb.) in Independent Science News: Global Civil Society: The Dire Consequences of Secretive Biotech Regulation
Synopsis: Global Civil Society groups are rejecting, on the basis of their first-hand experiences of past biotechnology, a major new push for insiders to regulate biotechnologies of the future. The new Civil Society Statement, which summarises some of the disasters produced by existing biotechnologies, is signed by over 50 global nonprofit groups including: Via Campesina, the Pesticide and Agroecology Network (PAN), MASIPAG (Philippines); Family Farm Defenders; The Alliance for Humane Biotechnology; Bangladesh Krishok Federation; Farmworker Association of Florida; Tanzania Organic Agriculture Movement; Organic Consumers Association; Regeneration International; and others.
A short introduction and the Global Civil Society Statement, and the full list of signatories, can be read at:
Share

In Testimony, Robert Garry Declines To Rule Out That Researchers Brought Ebola To West Africa In 2014

Published today (Monday 27th January, 2025) by Independent Science News: In Testimony, Robert Garry Declines To Rule Out That Researchers Brought Ebola To West Africa In 2014 by Jonathan Latham, PhD.
Synopsis: Back in June 2024 the Senate committee on the Origin of COVID-19 made its first and so far only investigative foray into the origin of the Ebola outbreak that ravaged West Africa in 2014. In its June hearing committee members questioned Prof. Bob Garry of Tulane University about his authorship of the infamous Proximal Origins paper on COVID-19; but afterwards they also submitted written questions. Most of these latter concern the Ebola 2014 outbreak which has attracted concern since it occurred far from the normal endemic range of Ebola virus, which is Central Africa. Bob Garry is intimately connected to that outbreak through his presidency of the Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium (VHFC), a US non-profit with a research facility in Kenema, Sierra Leone. Research at Kenema is the primary suspect for being the ultimate source of the 2014 Ebola outbreak, and now Garry’s answers have been released as part of the conclusions of the committee. What those answers do is to suggest how the spillover might have happened. He points the finger at another organisation that worked at Kenema in 2013 and 2014. It is the company Metabiota, whose employees I can reveal were sampling for human pathogenic viruses in Central Africa shortly before the outbreak.
Share

The Future of the Lab Leak Theory

Published on Sunday, 17th March, 2024 by Independent Science News: The Future of the Lab Leak Theory
by Jonathan Latham, PhD and Allison Wilson, PhD.
Synposis: Recent developments in the lab leak theory of COVID19’s origins have been very significant. New documents revealed by the organisation US Right To Know under FOIA legislation have added specific evidential flesh to the suggestion that work was underway to assemble viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2. The new specifics include the purchase of particular DNA cutting enzymes whose use had previously only been inferred by sequence analysis of SARS-CoV-2 as likely signatures of viral genetic engineering. But the new FOIA evidence, though damning in suggesting basic manipulation and a lab escape, collectively explains only a fraction of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Where did the rest come from? Why should we care? In this article, originally posted as a thread of tweets (on Twitter/X), we highlight new evidence showing that, before appearing in Wuhan, SARS-CoV-2 developed features that required substantial evolution after exiting its bat reservoir host. The evolutionary pathway needed for this can be inferred and it is incompatible with any standard or obvious zoonotic process involving an intermediate host. Key features of SARS-CoV-2, in short, are difficult to reconcile either with genetic engineering or a zoonosis. The simple explanation for them is selection and evolution in immunocompromised human lungs, presumably one of the Mojiang miners. Most likely therefore, SARS-CoV-2 was, simultaneously, a lab leak, a reverse engineered virus, and an evolutionary product of a miner lung, since these theories are compatible with each other and, in fact, complementary.
Share

The American Chestnut Foundation Bails as GE Chestnut Develops Growth and Fertility Problems and Fails to Resist the Blight

was written by Anne Petermann of the Global Justice Ecology Project.
Synopsis: On December 8th, 2023, The American Chestnut Foundation (TACF) revealed it was withdrawing its support for the Darling 58 GE blight-resistant chestnut (D58). The Darling 58 Chestnut is a genetically engineered tree variety being developed by the State University of New York Forestry School (SUNY-ESF). It is intended to resist the chestnut blight fungus that almost eradicated the American Chestnut. Currently, the D58 chestnut is the subject of a petition for deregulation by USDA. TACF is withdrawing its support because the GE trees given to them by SUNY-ESF were not Darling 58 but Darling 54, a different GE event, but primarily because the trees they were given failed to thrive even in the absence of the blight. According to documentation on the TACF website the GE trees were stunted, often chlorotic (yellow), and often developed brown leaves. Moreover, the GE chestnuts did not effectively resist the blight fungus. The onus is now on SUNY-ESF to withdraw the GE Chestnut petition or for USDA to reject it, as the introduction of genetically inferior GE trees represents a danger to surviving non-GE Chestnuts.
Learn more by reading the complete article at:
 
Share

Transgenic Rice Once Again Proposed as Solution to Bacterial Blight Outbreaks, This Time in Africa

Published on Thursday Sept 14th, 2023 in Independent Science News: Transgenic Rice Once Again Proposed as Solution to Bacterial Blight Outbreaks, This Time in Africa by GRAIN
SYNOPSIS: Gates Foundation-funded researchers are touting a new variety of transgenic rice as the solution to a bacterial blight threatening rice growers in Tanzania. The disease is new to Africa, at least in this form, and it threatens rice across the continent. The ironies of this situation are many. The blight probably came from China via a Chinese agribusiness that was offering ‘improved’ rice seeds. Meanwhile, solutions to bacterial blights already exist in the form of sustainable agroecology practices but these are being ignored.

(GRAIN is a small international non-profit organisation that works to support small farmers and social movements in their struggles for community-controlled and biodiversity-based food systems).

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT:

Share
Donate button

Sign up to our mailing list

E-mail address :
Name (optional):

Document Leaks

Exposing the Toxic Secrets of Corporations and Regulators

Quote of the day

We can either have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both.

- Louis Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice

Our latest video

How the Evolution of Novel COVID-19 Variants Validates the Mojiang Miners Passage theory.

  • Recommended websites

Share
Share